Recently, some things just don't feel right about canon, and what canon means. I have grown up in the early 2000s, right before many of what would be said the "Sequel resurrections" began, or even rebooting classic franchises, so I grew up on a lot of older media thanks to my parents, from what they liked. It's why I fell in love for things like Back to the Future, Wizard of Oz, The Herbie series of Movies, and such. It's because back then that's what you had. If you wanted to watch something of the past, you went out and found it, or you found a book of that series and read about it. Back then, the series on TV wasn't the end for that series. Books and audio stories and all sorts of other media was created and written and produced by love for that series. It's how we ended up with books like Dark Mirror for the Next Generation, or the Indiana Jones series of Novels. They were not just to fill in gaps, but they were written out of love and to tell their own stories with these characters.
|
May I introduce, the New James T. Kirk. |
It's Why I have to show pictures like this and just cringe. This picture is of the brand new series, with a Brand new James T. Kirk in the reigns, to "bring up the ratings" and bring up the show to new heights. It is the exact problem I have with today's Nostalgia Baiting. While I would like these shows in principle, bringing these characters to new adventures or telling ones that haven't been told, it is the way that they can't help themselves. This is the third James T. Kirk to be brought into Star Trek Fandom now. In 2009, One was created, with much backlash, and in order to save that production before it was burned to the ground, they had to create an entire "new timeline" for it to exist, and while it's 3 movies do have their fans and it's interests, it made sense, but worked as a trilogy. Don't add any more. (Oops, adding a 4th, see where I am going with this?)
No, see, it is with this exact sort of thing that I have a problem, and why now I have to write down my thoughts about Nostalgia baiting. It just doesn't work. Normally, when you try to bring back classic characters, you bring back those characters and their actors. It's why for 2009, they brought back Old Spock and MADE it old Spock, It's How Star Trek Online thrived in it's storytelling, telling of the universe post Spock's disappearance. But now all of the Original Series actors are all but gone, with a few notable selections. However, in this new age of recasting, why not just throw something together with a new guy? "Hey everyone, Look! A New Kirk! We can make those stories you always wanted to see now!" It's like with Solo. Instead of letting other people tell their stories, Disney ran out and published a two bit jumbled mess of "This is Han Solo, a liar and a cheat who lied about his conquests but secretly is the hero that we know of in A New Hope." No, no, no, That's not how these things go.
Series nowadays aren't being left to serve as jumping off points as they were in the past. Nowadays, it's like every single gap must be grouted over, every single story must be shown in full detail and explain, with iron grips, so that THEY have the claims to what stories they can tell with their characters. What happened to the age of Creativity?